Casino Shafts Banned Man
So you're Troy Blackford, and you like to gamble. One day back in 1996, you're in the Prairie Meadows Racetrack and Casino (owned by the County), and you get ticked at a slot machine. You punch it and yell at it. As a result you are banned from ever returning to the casino. No matter. You keep returning and losing money. A few years go by, and you request that the ban be lifted. Denied. You still keep going back. You even get added to your wife's account, apparently due to a casino employee's error.
Then, Blackford's lucky day came, May 5, 2006 - or so he thought. As reported by the Des Moines Register,
Blackford ... sauntered up to Dynamite Jack, a 25-cent machine that showed promise. He bet the maximum amount - 45 quarters, or $11.25 per roll - and pushed the "Spin" button.
Lights flashed. The credit-count soared. Gamblers turned and stared as Dynamite Jack delivered $7,181.25, which boosted his total to nearly $10,000.
A female employee walked over, smiled, and asked for two forms of identification.Uh-oh. It turns out that
Banned gamblers get flagged when they win more than $1,200, when employees recognize them, or when spouses call the casino ...
Police ticketed Blackford, took his winnings, read the trespass warning again, and watched him leave.So, the casino is delighted to take your money when you lose. But when you win more than $1,200, they're still delighted to take your money! (So the money goes to a state account to help gambling addicts. A good cause, surely, but it's not the casino's money to give!) Now I can see the criminal trespass charge (which was dismissed), but taking his winnings? That's wrong. So Blackford took the case to court and ... lost. He will probably appeal. You can read more (a fair amount) here.
Think again. You are not a "manual scavenger." As described by writer Sunil Kuksal:
I'll call him Fuzzy because, well, I don't know his name. Since he's a minor and wasn't charged with a felony, his name has been withheld. Now technically, Fuzzy didn't actually "streak" across the Parkland High School (Pennsylvania) gym [during a basketball game!] because he had a sock on his ... jimmy. You're the school superintendent. What do you do? I would suspend him for a couple days. But nooooooooooooo, not Superintendent Louise Donohue. She booted him, for the rest of the year, to an alternative school (also attended by [former] knife-wielding students) run by a private company. Said Fuzzy of the punishment:
So far it hasn't set David King back any, either. And this has to go down as the slowest getaway in the history of crime. Mr. King rented a narrowboat for 2 weeks in Cheshire, England. The boat's top speed - 4 MPH! You can probably guess what Mr. King did when his 2 weeks on the $80,000 boat were up. He kept right on going. Despite a national manhunt, King avoided capture for 5 weeks! And we're not talking about open water. We're talking CANALS!
(For this story, you can safely put aside your position on legalizing marijuana. It's not about the pot.) So back in April 2006, then-Cpl. Edward Sanchez, of the Dearborn, Michigan police, called 911 and said:
Not exactly your fall-on-the-sword type of guy, Sanchez first told investigators that, while he was sleeping, his wife took the pot out of his car. His wife (who admitted to taking cocaine from her husband's police car and using it during a 3-week binge!), truly a stand-by-your-man woman, told investigators that she tricked her husband into eating the pot brownies.
So at long last, the slumlord, anesthesiologist Esmat Zaklama, appeared before Guttenberg, New Jersey Municipal Judge Frank Leanza. Here's a little history on Dr. Zaklama (from the New Jersey Law Journal):
The result? She lost! "The content of the blog was related to school issues, and it was reasonably foreseeable that other LMHS students would view the blog and that school administrators would become aware of it," said U.S. District Court Judge Mark Kravitz. I think her Mom, who was praised on local radio for telling Avery "you're grounded, and we're going to federal court to file a civil suit," has it right. She said
According to the police in 
The most tragic part of the story is that it looks like Mr. Poku never did anything wrong. He lost his house because his mortgage company couldn’t find key documents that would prove his initial loan had been paid, a bank didn’t have its paperwork in order, and the title company that handled Mr. Poku’s refinancing is now out of business. Even though Mr. Poku kept photocopies of all his mortgage checks, he couldn’t prove that the original check issued to pay off his first mortgage was accepted because he only had a photocopy of the front part of the $96,599.74 check.