<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Legal Juice</title>
      <link>http://www.legaljuice.com/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 03:15:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.33</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Okay, So Maybe Working In A Nursing Home Isn&apos;t The Best Job, But ...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.legaljuice.com/toothbrush%20funny%20wacky%20crazy%20silly%20wild.jpg"><img alt="toothbrush%20funny%20wacky%20crazy%20silly%20wild.jpg" src="http://www.legaljuice.com/toothbrush%20funny%20wacky%20crazy%20silly%20wild-thumb.jpg" width="418" height="313" /></a></p>

<p>Warning: Brushing your teeth will not be the same for a little while after you read this.  As reported in the Evening Telegraph, nursing home worker Nina Strange <blockquote>...dip[ped] a toothbrush into bath water, in which a patient had just defecated, before using it to brush the 75-year-old woman's teeth.</blockquote> That's just the grossest of the transgressions of which Ms. Strange was convicted.  Here are the others: <blockquote>- hitting an 88-year-old wheelchair-bound woman across the back of the head;</blockquote> <blockquote>- twice hitting an 81-year-old man around the head; and </blockquote>  <blockquote>- pulling an 81-year-old woman's hair as she put her to bed. </blockquote>Ms. Strange has been suspended, and is awaiting sentencing.  Here's <a href="http://www.thisisderbyshire.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=124378&command=displayContent&sourceNode=231734&home=yes&more_nodeId1=124522&contentPK=20573679">the source</a>.</p>

<p><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/05/okay_so_maybe_working_in_a_nur.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/05/okay_so_maybe_working_in_a_nur.html</guid>
         <category>Uncool</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 03:15:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>65-Year-Old Living With Mom Wigs Out</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.legaljuice.com/taser%20Don%27t%20Tase%20me%20bro.jpg"><img alt="taser%20Don%27t%20Tase%20me%20bro.jpg" src="http://www.legaljuice.com/taser%20Don%27t%20Tase%20me%20bro-thumb.jpg" width="240" height="240"align = "right"style="margin-left: 7px;" /></a> So maybe it's only a little strange that 65-year-old Tad Gunter is living with his 85-year-old mother, Margery Gunter. Actually, it's really nice if he's taking care of her.  What do you think, nice or strange?  <blockquote>Margery Gunter told deputies that her son, Tad Gunter, has been acting weird for the past month, according to an arrest report. She told deputies that her son sits in the living room and fondles himself sexually five times a day in front of her.</blockquote> Shazam!  I guess you could say the day was going along like any other [at least for the past month] until Ms. Gunter messed with her son's routine.  She asked him to refill a prescription for her, and he wigged out, throwing a bottle of laundry detergent at her.  Then, as reported by the Naples Daily News, <blockquote>A witness, Ruel Montez, grabbed Margery Gunter, brought her to the kitchen and locked the door. Tad Gunter began yelling and throwing things around the room, reports said.</blockquote>  Mr. Gunter did not take kindly to police intervention. <blockquote> When a deputy arrived, Tad Gunter told him to leave, put his hand on the deputy’s chest and pushed him, authorities said. During a confrontation, the deputy pushed Tad Gunter to the floor. When he tried to get up while swinging his arms and kicking his legs, the deputy drew his Taser.</blockquote> Don't tase him, bro! <blockquote>When Tad Gunter attempted to kick the deputy, the deputy deployed his Taser, striking him with a five-second jolt. During the struggle the deputy gave Gunter two more five-second jolts until one of the Taser’s probes fell out, report said.</blockquote> <blockquote>When Gunter continued to struggle, the deputy delivered two three-second shocks by placing the Taser against his calf, the Sheriff’s Office reported.</blockquote> Is this dude shockproof?  Nope. <blockquote>After he was handcuffed Tad Gunter apologized for his behavior.</blockquote> Um. Er. Uh.  Sorry.  (Here's the <a href="http://www.naplesnews.com/news/2008/may/05/immokalee-man-tasered-during-fight-deputy/">Naples Daily News</a> story.)</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/05/65yearold_still_living_with_mo.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/05/65yearold_still_living_with_mo.html</guid>
         <category>Odd Cases</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 03:50:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>More Weird And Wacky British Laws</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.legaljuice.com/royal%20dog%20pet%20queen%20king.jpg"><img alt="royal%20dog%20pet%20queen%20king.jpg" src="http://www.legaljuice.com/royal%20dog%20pet%20queen%20king-thumb.jpg" width="183" height="266"align = "right"style="margin-left: 7px;" /></a>  In addition to a few <a href="http://www.legaljuice.com/2007/11/weird_british_laws.html">previously noted</a> wacky British laws, as reported in The Daily Mirror, here are a few more that are still on the books: <blockquote>A law enacted by George I states that: "The severest penaltys will be suffered by any commoner who doth permit his animal to have carnal knowledge of a pet of the Royal house."</blockquote><blockquote>In York, it is still legal to murder a Scotsman within the city's ancient walls, but only if he is carrying a bow and arrow.</blockquote> <blockquote>In a law passed in 1837, women are allowed to bite off a man's nose if he kisses her against her will.</blockquote> <blockquote>A law enacted by Edward VI states that anyone found breaking a boiled egg at the sharp end will be sentenced to 24 hours in the village stocks.</blockquote> <blockquote>It is illegal to stand within one hundred yards of the reigning monarch when not wearing socks.</blockquote> <blockquote>A motorist who feels compelled to urinate in public can do so only if he aims for his rear wheel and keeps his right hand on his vehicle. </blockquote> To read more, click <a href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/topstories/2008/03/20/did-you-know-it-s-illegal-to-die-in-the-house-of-parliament-britain-s-silliest-laws-revealed-89520-20356691/">here</a>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/05/more_weird_and_wacky_british_l.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/05/more_weird_and_wacky_british_l.html</guid>
         <category>Weird Laws</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 03:47:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Tennessee Republican Leader With Some Serious Gender Issues</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.legaljuice.com/sex%20change%20operation%20surgery%20male%20to%20female.jpg"><img alt="sex%20change%20operation%20surgery%20male%20to%20female.jpg" src="http://www.legaljuice.com/sex%20change%20operation%20surgery%20male%20to%20female-thumb.jpg" width="418" height="209" /></a></p>

<p>Perhaps that's the reason Tennessee House Republican Leader Jason Mumpower did what he did. As reported in the Nashville Scene: <blockquote>Tennessee is the only state in nation with a law preventing sex-change recipients from retroactively revising the sex designation on their birth certificates to correspond with their new gender identity. The law makes it difficult for those who have undergone such surgical changes to get driver’s licenses and other documentation, because obtaining such critical documents invariably requires a birth certificate.</blockquote> So a bunch of Democrats put together a bill to bring Tennessee in line with EVERY OTHER STATE.  Mr. Mumpower would have none of this.  How did he kill the bill? <blockquote> Mumpower attached an amendment that would have essentially created a new category of sex. </blockquote>  Really?  <em>Go on.</em> <blockquote> “A birth certificate can be amended with the designation MTF,” Mumpower tells the Scene, “designating male to female, or FTM designating female to male.”</blockquote> I wonder if he considers himself a "compassionate conservative?" Here's <a href="http://www.nashvillescene.com/Stories/News/2008/04/24/Confederacy_of_Dunces/">the source</a> (scroll down).</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/05/tennessee_republican_leader_wi_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/05/tennessee_republican_leader_wi_1.html</guid>
         <category>Weird Laws</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 03:42:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Kid Gets Suspended For This?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.legaljuice.com/shock%20electric%20zap%20electrical.gif"><img alt="shock%20electric%20zap%20electrical.gif" src="http://www.legaljuice.com/shock%20electric%20zap%20electrical-thumb.gif" width="220" height="280"align = "right"style="margin-left: 7px;"/></a>Yes, Christian Haughwout, a 14-year-old student at The Morgan School in Clinton, Connecticut, was suspended for 10 days for ... bringing a camera to school that emits a mild shock!  The official reason for the suspension? <blockquote>"Possession of a dangerous instrument and causing a threat or danger to the physical well-being of himself or other people." </blockquote> Really?  Yes, and on top of that, as reported by The Hartford Courant: <blockquote> In juvenile court, the boy also faces charges of possession of a dangerous weapon on school grounds, attempted assault and breach of peace.</blockquote>  Suspended and busted! What to do. Christian's parents challenged the suspension via a lawsuit in federal court.  The case was settled, with the school letting Christian return, and his parents agreeing to drop the lawsuit.  Of course that doesn't dispose of the juvenile court case.  Christian is definitely an interesting kid.  You can read more (a lot) <a href="http://www.courant.com/news/local/hc-expelledgeek0503.artmay03,0,5232783.story">here</a>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/05/kid_gets_suspended_for_this.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/05/kid_gets_suspended_for_this.html</guid>
         <category>Get A Life!</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 03:27:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Male Lawyer Called Female Lawyer What?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="babe%20on%20board%20sign.jpg" src="http://www.legaljuice.com/babe%20on%20board%20sign.jpg" width="98" height="100"align = "right"style="margin-left: 7px;" />This is not your garden variety "babe-calling" case.  Ms. Aude sued Mr. Mullaney for negligently giving her herpes. (The jury found that he did, but that she was "contributorily negligent.")  Mr. Mullaney was represented by Allen Harris (and Benjamin Lipsitz).  Ms. Aude was represented by Susan Green and Gary Bernstein.</p>

<p>At Ms. Aude's deposition, "as [she] was leaving the room to retrieve [a] document, Mr. Harris remarked that she was going to meet '[a]nother boyfriend' at the car.  Ms. Green and Mr. Bernstein quickly told Mr. Harris that his comment was in poor taste and asked him to refrain from making further derogatory comments. The following ensued:" <br />
<blockquote>MR. MULLANEY: It's going to be a fun trial. [Oh, and he's a lawyer, too. Very professional, no?]<br />
MR. HARRIS: It must have been in poor taste if Miss Green says it was in poor tasted.  It must have really been in poor taste.<br />
MS. GREEN: You got a problem with me?<br />
MR. HARRIS: No, I don't have a problem with you, babe. [uh oh]<br />
MS. GREEN: Babe?  You called me babe?  What generation are you from?<br />
MR. HARRIS: At least I didn't call you a bimbo. [have shovel, will dig]<br />
MR.LIPSITZ: Cut it out.<br />
MS. GREEN: The committee will enjoy hearing about that.<br />
MR. BERNSTEIN: Alan, you ought to stay out of the gutter.</blockquote></p>

<p>"According to Ms. Green's legal assistant, Harris's reference to Ms. Green as 'babe' continued throughout the litigation.  In an affidavit ... she stated that 'in the course of her employment, [Mr. Harris] did telephone Ms. Green's office and ask, 'Is the babe in?'  He also referred to [the legal assistant] as 'babe."</p>

<p>Ms. Green then filed a motion asking the Court to put an end to this conduct (and some other defense conduct), and requested attorneys' fees.  So what do you think happened?</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/05/male_lawyer_call_female_lawyer_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/05/male_lawyer_call_female_lawyer_1.html</guid>
         <category>Best Of</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 04:22:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>So Much For &quot;Revenge Is A Dish Best Served Cold&quot;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.legaljuice.com/scam%20artist%20revenge%20payback%20con%20artist.jpg"><img alt="scam%20artist%20revenge%20payback%20con%20artist.jpg" src="http://www.legaljuice.com/scam%20artist%20revenge%20payback%20con%20artist-thumb.jpg" width="351" height="418" /></a></p>

<p>Actually, "hot" and "warm" revenge didn't work out too well either for David Alan Hawkins, who had the misfortune of trying to develop a condominium project when the Savings and Loan crisis hit in the 1980s.  He lost his financing, and the project, with the collapse of Queen City Savings and Loan.  And, as reported by the Seattle Times: <blockquote>To add insult to injury, Hawkins won a $3.5 million jury verdict against the S&L, only to have it stripped from him by a judge over a technicality — a move that outraged the jurors who had awarded him the money, according to court documents and news accounts from the time.</blockquote>  How would Hawkins get even? <blockquote>For years, Hawkins sought justice, using increasingly confrontational and bizarre tactics that included placing invalid liens on the homes of those he blamed — including bankers, judges and lawyers — and filing so many lawsuits that he was banned from filing documents in King County in 1994.</blockquote> You know it's bad when you are banned from filing documents with the court, a fate usually reserved for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pro_se">pro se</a> prisoner plaintiffs. Fast forward to the present.  Hawkins ratcheted the revenge WAY up, with the help of attorney Harry Skeins Jr.  They were "selling" the homes of people involved in Hawkins' misfortune 25 years ago (e.g. Judges, lawyers, a bank executive).  Just one problem - they had no interest in the homes!  How did they do it? <blockquote>Hawkins and Skeins set up a fake title-insurance company and convinced lenders that they held legitimate liens on the homes of their victims. An Atlanta lender gave them more than $1.5 million for the sale of homes belonging to a state appeals court judge and a bank executive ... </blockquote> How did they get busted? <blockquote>... the men were arrested in 2006 after a judge's wife questioned a real-estate appraiser who showed up at her home one day, according to court documents. </blockquote> The time?  Four years in prison, and about $1.6 million in restitution. Here's <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/eastsidenews/2004374947_obsessed26m.html">the source</a>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/05/so_much_for_revenge_is_a_dish.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/05/so_much_for_revenge_is_a_dish.html</guid>
         <category>Odd Cases</category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 04:22:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Man Climbs On Roof Of Moving Vehicle?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.legaljuice.com/naked%20nude%20runner%20running%20jogger%20man%20person.jpg"><img alt="naked%20nude%20runner%20running%20jogger%20man%20person.jpg" src="http://www.legaljuice.com/naked%20nude%20runner%20running%20jogger%20man%20person-thumb.jpg" width="418" height="359" /></a></p>

<p>Okay, maybe that sounds just a little insane.  But consider this - he was driving!  As reported in the Reading Eagle, <blockquote>Messerly was driving his employer’s minivan on the bypass in West Reading about 3 p.m. April 4 when he climbed out of the driver-side window, stood on the roof and was catapulted into the woods when the van crashed into a guide rail, borough police said.</blockquote> And that was just the beginning.  Mr. Messerly (age 38, of Reading, Pennsylvania) was then seen running - totally naked - along the road. Someone called the cops, and here's what happened: <blockquote>When they arrived, the officers were confronted by a nude Messerly, who came toward them and ignored orders to stop. Two of the officers used Taser stun guns on Messerly to try to stop him.</blockquote> <blockquote>Messerly fell to the ground, but got up as the officers approached him. A third officer hit Messerly in the back with a Taser, which briefly stunned him.</blockquote> <blockquote>Messerly still refused to heed the officers’ orders and started toward them again.</blockquote> <blockquote>One of the officers sprayed Messerly in the face with pepper spray, another hit him in the back with a baton and another reactivated one of the Tasers.</blockquote> <blockquote>Messerly still refused to cooperate.</blockquote> <blockquote>After a second shot of pepper spray to his face, another hit to his back with a baton and a fifth jolt from a Taser, Messerly was taken to the ground and handcuffed.</blockquote> Unbelievable!  The explanation?<blockquote> ... Messerly ... told police he had used crack cocaine the night before the April 4 accident and had not slept since then, according to [Court] documents.</blockquote>  The charges? <blockquote>... driving under the influence, risking a catastrophe, indecent exposure, resisting arrest, public drunkenness and related offenses.</blockquote>  Here's <a href="http://www.readingeagle.com/article.aspx?id=90341">the source</a>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/05/man_climbs_on_roof_of_moving_v_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/05/man_climbs_on_roof_of_moving_v_1.html</guid>
         <category>Wacky</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 03:51:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Lesbians Sue lesbians?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-WyafqUoKak&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-WyafqUoKak&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>

<p>So no matter what happens, the lesbians win!  Actually, that's not true. The Lesbians might win. What the hell am I talking about?  Three Greek women who live on the island of Lesbos filed suit against the Homosexual and Lesbian Community of Greece, per the AP, claiming that its name "insults the identity" of the people of Lesbos.</p>

<p>Please!  Even assuming the Lesbians defeat the lesbians, what about the other, um, BILLIONS OF PEOPLE who will still use the word "lesbian" as a synonym for a gay woman?  What's next, <em>Lesbos v. Rest of World?</em> Ladies, you can't unring the bell.  You can't put the genie back in the bottle. (Help. Any more trite phrases to express this?)  Here's <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080430/ap_on_re_eu/greece_lesbian_pride">the AP story</a>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/05/lesbians_sue_lesbians_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/05/lesbians_sue_lesbians_1.html</guid>
         <category>Odd Cases</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 03:17:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Cops Summon A Three-Year-Old?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.legaljuice.com/Cartman%20Cop%20silly%20police%20officer%20stupid%20wacky.jpg"><img alt="Cartman%20Cop%20silly%20police%20officer%20stupid%20wacky.jpg" src="http://www.legaljuice.com/Cartman%20Cop%20silly%20police%20officer%20stupid%20wacky-thumb.jpg" width="275" height="187" align = "right"style="margin-left: 7px;"/></a>  They did.  They summoned him to court (on charges of creating a law and order problem!), and 3-year-old Mukesh Prasad came with his daddy.  The Magistrate was <em>pissed</em>.  The summons was immediately dismissed.  How did this happen?  Seems a couple of police officers in Sultanpur, India were looking for Mukesh's 19-year-old brother, Sunil.  As reported in The Indian Express: <blockquote>Since he [Sunil] was missing, the police moved an application in the court to book his brother. The application was moved on April 22, and Mukesh was asked to appear on May 9. </blockquote>  Um. Er. Sorry.  What became of the summons-happy officers?  They were suspended.  You can read more (just a tiny bit) <a href="http://www.indianexpress.com/story/302906.html">here</a>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/04/cops_summon_a_threeyearold_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/04/cops_summon_a_threeyearold_1.html</guid>
         <category>Oops</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 03:48:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>This Is How You Examine Someone For An Ear Infection?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="ear%20exam%20cartoon%20illustrations%20examination.gif" src="http://www.legaljuice.com/ear%20exam%20cartoon%20illustrations%20examination.gif" width="128" height="120"align = "right"style="margin-left: 7px;"  />You would not believe the frequency with which doctors sexually abuse their patients.  In doing research for these posts, I come across cases similar to this at least several times each week. </p>

<p>According to a woman examined by Arkansas Dr. Clarence Jay Arendall, here's what happened, as reported by the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: <blockquote>[The woman] said in the lawsuit filed March 12 that she visited Arendall for an ear infection in the past five years but that during the examination, he lowered her pants, touched her genitals, fondled her breasts and made sexual comments to her.</blockquote> <blockquote>The suit also claims that Arendall made her addicted to pain pills. He prescribed the pain pills to her and had her pick them up each week at his office after hours, and continued to increase her prescription until she was taking 240 pills a week, the suit states.</blockquote> <blockquote>The woman experienced seven seizures, of which Arendall was aware. And he knew that the pain medication was associated with seizures but continued to increase the dosage, the suit states.</blockquote> <blockquote>He also threatened to have her husband fired from his job if the woman told anyone about his conduct, according to the lawsuit.</blockquote> Maybe these are just baseless allegations?  Unlikely.  Consider this: The prosecutor said that <blockquote>Alma Police Chief Russell White told him last week that investigators had received complaints from 15 to 20 women who claimed to have been sexually abused by Arendall. </blockquote> Dr. Arundell has been charged with second-degree sexual abuse, and is being investigated regarding the additional 15-20 complaints received by the police.  And his medical license was suspended pending the outcome of a disciplinary hearing.  You can read more <a href="http://www.nwanews.com/adg/News/222331/">here</a>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/04/this_is_how_you_examine_someon.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/04/this_is_how_you_examine_someon.html</guid>
         <category>Doctor, Doctor</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:07:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Traffic Court Judge, Who Knows A Thing Or Two About Traffic Tickets, In The Soup Again.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Philadelphia Traffic Court Judge Willie F. Singletary knows a thing or two, OR 55, about traffic tickets.  That's because, a year ago, his driver's licenses was suspended through 2011 <em>due to 55 traffic violations</em> totalling $11,427, as reported by the Philadelphia Daily News.  And he was elected Traffic Court Judge after he got busted!</p>

<p>Now, though, having been in office only since January 7, 2007, he's looking at a different kind of trouble. <blockquote>The state Judicial Conduct Board issued a complaint yesterday charging Willie F. Singletary, 28, with five counts of misconduct for soliciting campaign donations from the Philadelphia First State Road Rattlers Motorcycle Club on April 22, 2007.</blockquote> Here's what allegedly went down.  How do people think this kind of thing won't come out? <blockquote>Then, Singletary asked each biker to give him $20 for his campaign, in violation of state judicial conduct rules, according to the 11-page complaint.</blockquote> <blockquote>"There's going to be a basket going around because I'm running for Traffic Court Judge, right, and I need some money," he said, according to the complaint. </blockquote> <blockquote>"Now, you all want me to get there, you're all going to need my hook-up, right," he continued. "It costs money," he added. "I have to raise $15,000 by Friday. I just hope you have it."</blockquote>  I'll give the Judge this: He eliminated the need to read between the lines.  And it's on YouTube, right here!</p>

<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/g32KtX3HU28&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/g32KtX3HU28&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>

<p>Shazam!  Here's <a href="http://www.philly.com/dailynews/local/20080423_Traffic_Court_Judge_Singletary_charged_with_misconduct.html">the article</a>. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/04/traffic_court_judge_who_knows.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/04/traffic_court_judge_who_knows.html</guid>
         <category>Here Comes the Judge</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 05:01:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Lawyer Said What To The Judge?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="happy_meal_logo.gif" src="http://www.legaljuice.com/happy_meal_logo.gif" width="307" height="268" align = "right"style="margin-left: 7px;"   />Here's what William P. Smith, Esq. said to the Judge in a Florida Bankruptcy proceeding: <blockquote>Mr. Smith: I suggest to you with respect, Your Honor, that you're a few French fries short of a Happy Meal in terms of what's likely to take place.</blockquote> Billy, Billy, Billy. You didn't just say that to a Judge?  In a court where you were admitted solely for the purpose of that particular case?  He did.  The "Order to Show Cause Why William P. Smith, Esq. Should Not Be Suspended from Practice Before This Court Including Revocation of His Current Pro Hac Vice Status" was issued in <em>In re South Beach Community Hospital, LLC</em>, Case No. 06-10634-BKC-LMI. Whew.  I'm out of breath.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/04/lawyer_said_what_to_the_judge.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/04/lawyer_said_what_to_the_judge.html</guid>
         <category>Best Of</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 04:02:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>A One Month Suspension For What?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.legaljuice.com/paper%20wad%20ball%20into%20trash%20can%20throwing%20shooting.jpg"><img alt="paper%20wad%20ball%20into%20trash%20can%20throwing%20shooting.jpg" src="http://www.legaljuice.com/paper%20wad%20ball%20into%20trash%20can%20throwing%20shooting-thumb.jpg" width="203" height="250"align = "right" style="margin-left: 5px;" /></a> Remember <a href="http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/04/was_this_psychiatrist_treated_1.html">the post the other day about the doctor who got <em>a one week suspension</em> for having a sexual relationship with a patient?</a>  Well, Dr. Mark Blaylock got a one month suspension for ... putting a picture of a government official in the trash!  For real.  Dr. Blaylock is the chief medical officer at the Manguzi Hospital in South Africa.  It would appear that health MEC [Member of the Executive Council] Peggy Nkonyeni took great offense at this most heinous crime.  So who will really suffer as a result of Dr. Blaylock's suspension?  Per allAfrica.com: <blockquote>Ironically, Blaylock will make more money working as a locum doctor in the private sector during this month's suspension than he does as a senior doctor at the rural hospital.</blockquote> <blockquote>A hospital source who asked not to be named said that, ultimately patients would suffer most as the hospital was short-staffed and Blaylock's skilled would be greatly missed. </blockquote> They sure showed him.  You can read more (a fair amount) <a href="http://allafrica.com/stories/200804221179.html">here</a>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/04/a_onemonth_suspension_for_what.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/04/a_onemonth_suspension_for_what.html</guid>
         <category>Doctor, Doctor</category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 04:17:53 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Was This Psychiatrist Treated Fairly?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Doctor%20Cartoon%20bad%20doctor%20mean%20evil.gif" src="http://www.legaljuice.com/Doctor%20Cartoon%20bad%20doctor%20mean%20evil.gif" width="250" height="266" align = "right" style="margin-left: 5px;"/>You are psychologist Andrew Jacobs, and you need a psychiatrist to treat your wife for depression.  Not surprisingly, you refer her to the same Harvard-trained psychiatrist you've been referring people to for 10 years.  Surprisingly, this man, Kansas Dr. Douglas Greenens, tells your wife that she is in an unhealthy marriage.  He then has a sexual relationship with your wife while she is still his patient!  You find out, so he ends the doctor-patient relationship, but soon thereafter, resumes the intimate relationship.  Your wife then divorces you and marries ... Dr. Greenens.</p>

<p>What punishment do you think the Kansas Board of Healing Arts handed down for this major violation of professional ethics?  Before I tell you, let me also share with you some additional information that the Board had in its possession, as reported by The Topeka Capital-Journal: <blockquote>Investigators with the Kansas board also have benefit of the Missouri healing arts board's confidential 300-page report on Geenens' out-of-bounds association with women. Geenens was publicly reprimanded by Missouri regulators and, to escape broader discipline, agreed in October to "retire" his license in that state.</blockquote> Snap!  300 pages?  On top of this incident?  The punishment: <em>a one-week suspension of his license! </em> <a href="http://www.auditmypc.com/acronym/UFB.asp">UFB!</a> (Also, his practice will be supervised for 2 years, and he has to attend a course.(La di da.)  Maybe he's emerged from all of this a changed man? <blockquote>Jacobs said Geenens bragged that a member of the healing arts board secretly promised him the board wouldn't hand down a severe punishment. Meanwhile, Geenens filed an ethics complaint against Jacobs in Missouri, but the case was dismissed a year later.</blockquote> Was that it for Greenens?  He (or more likely, his insurer) took a relatively small hit: <blockquote>Jacobs filed a civil lawsuit, later settled for $100,000, alleging Geenens prescribed psychiatric drugs to cause his wife to accept the doctor's advances.</blockquote> You can read more (a fair amount) <a href="http://cjonline.com/stories/032708/kan_262180889.shtml">here</a>.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/04/was_this_psychiatrist_treated_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legaljuice.com/2008/04/was_this_psychiatrist_treated_1.html</guid>
         <category>Doctor, Doctor</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 05:09:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
